References

  1. O. Bottema, R.Z. Djordjevic, R.R. Janic, D.S. Mitrinovic & P.M. Vasic (1969): Geometric Inequalities. Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, Groningen.
  2. A. W. Bowman & A. Azzalini (2013): Package sm: non-parametric smoothing methods (version 2.2-5). Available at http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/~adrian/sm.
  3. C. Brown & J.H. Davenport (2007): The complexity of quantifier elimination and cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Proceedings of ISSAC '07. ACM, pp. 54–60, doi:10.1145/1277548.1277557.
  4. C. W. Brown (2003): An Overview of QEPCAD B: a Tool for Real Quantifier Elimination and Formula Simplification. Journal of Japan Society for Symbolic and Algebraic Computation 10(1), pp. 13–22.
  5. Christopher W. Brown (2021): Saclib. A GitHub project. https://github.com/chriswestbrown/saclib.
  6. C. Chen & M. M. Maza (2016): Quantifier Elimination by Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition based on Regular Chains. Journal of Symbolic Computation 75, pp. 74–93, doi:10.1016/j.jsc.2015.11.008.
  7. S. C. Chou (1988): Mechanical Geometry Theorem Proving. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  8. S. C. Chou, X. S. Gao & J. Z. Zhang (2000): A Deductive Database Approach To Automated Geometry Theorem Proving and Discovering. Journal of Automated Reasoning 25(3), pp. 219–246, doi:10.1023/A:1006171315513.
  9. G. E. Collins & H. Hong (1991): Partial Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition for Quantifier Elimination. Journal of Symbolic Computation 12, pp. 299–328, doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(08)80152-6.
  10. J.H. Davenport & J. Heintz (1988): Real quantifier elimination is doubly exponential. Journal of Symbolic Computation 5(1-2), pp. 29–35, doi:10.1016/S0747-7171(88)80004-X.
  11. A. Dolzmann & T. Sturm (1997): Redlog: Computer Algebra Meets Computer Logic. ACM SIGSAM Bulletin 31(2), pp. 2–9, doi:10.1145/261320.261324.
  12. H. Iwane, H. Yanami & H Anai (2014): SyNRAC: a toolbox for solving real algebraic constraints. In: Proceedings of ICMS-2014. LNCS, vol. 8592. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 518–522.
  13. Jianguo Jiang & Jing Zhong Zhang (2012): A review and prospect of readable machine proofs for geometry theorems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 25(4), doi:10.1007/s11424-012-2048-3.
  14. Zoltán Kovács (2015): The Relation Tool in GeoGebra 5. In: Francisco Botana & Pedro Quaresma: Automated Deduction in Geometry: 10th International Workshop, ADG 2014, Coimbra, Portugal, July 9-11, 2014, Revised Selected Papers. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 53–71, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21362-0_4.
  15. Zoltán Kovács (2020): Automated Detection of Interesting Properties in Regular Polygons. Mathematics in Computer Science 14, pp. 727–755, doi:10.1007/s11786-020-00491-z.
  16. Zoltán Kovács (2020): GeoGebra Discovery. A GitHub project. https://github.com/kovzol/geogebra-discovery.
  17. Zoltán Kovács & Bernard Parisse (2015): Giac and GeoGebra – Improved Gröbner Basis Computations. In: Jaime Gutierrez, Josef Schicho & Martin Weimann: Computer Algebra and Polynomials, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, pp. 126–138, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15081-9_7.
  18. Zoltán Kovács, Tomás Recio & Csilla Sólyom-Gecse (2019): Rewriting input expressions in complex algebraic geometry provers. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 85, pp. 73–87, doi:10.1007/s10472-018-9590-1.
  19. K. Kusche, B. Kutzler & H. Mayr (1989): Implementation of a geometry theorem proving package in SCRATCHPAD II. In: James H. Davenport: Eurocal '87. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 246–257, doi:10.1007/3-540-51517-8_123.
  20. Tomás Recio & M. Pilar Vélez (1999): Automatic discovery of theorems in elementary geometry. Journal of Automated Reasoning 23, pp. 63–82, doi:10.1023/A:1006135322108.
  21. Mohab Safey El Din (2007): RAGlib: A library for real solving polynomial systems of equations and inequalities. https://www-polsys.lip6.fr/~safey/RAGLib/.
  22. Róbert Vajda & Zoltán Kovács (2020): GeoGebra and theıtshape realgeom Reasoning Tool. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 204–219. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2752/paper15.pdf.
  23. F. Vale-Enriquez & C.W. Brown (2018): Polynomial Constraints and Unsat Cores in Tarski. In: Mathematical Software – ICMS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10931. Springer, Cham, pp. 466–474, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96418-8_55.
  24. D. Wang (2002): Geother 1.1: Handling and proving geometric theorems automatically. In: ADG 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2930. Springer, pp. 194–215, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24616-9_12.
  25. Wolfram Research, Inc. (2020): Mathematica, Version 12.1. Champaign, IL.
  26. W. T. Wu (1978): On the decision problem and the mechanization of theorem proving in elementary geometry. Scientia Sinica 21, pp. 157–179.
  27. B. Xia (2007): DISCOVERER: A tool for solving semi-algebraic systems. ACM SIGSAM Bulletin 41(3), pp. 102–103.
  28. L. Yang, X. Hou & B. Xia (1999): Automated Discovering and Proving for Geometric Inequalities. In: ADG'1998, LNAI 1669. Springer-Verlag, pp. 30–46.
  29. L. Yang & J. Zhang (2001): A practical program of automated proving for a class of geometric inequalities. In: Automated Deduction in Geometry, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2061. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 41–57, doi:10.5555/647693.731185.
  30. Zheng Ye, Shang Ching Chou & Xiao Shan Gao (2011): An Introduction to Java Geometry Expert. In: Automated Deduction in Geometry. Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 189–195, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21046-4_10.
  31. Alon Zakai (2013): Emscripten: An LLVM-to-JavaScript Compiler. https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/blob/master/docs/paper.pdf?raw=true.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org