References

  1. P. Ammann & P.E. Black (2001): A specification-based coverage metric to evaluate test sets. International Journal of Quality, Reliability and Safety Engineering 8(4), pp. 275–300, doi:10.1142/S0218539301000530.
  2. I. Beer, S. Ben-David, H. Chockler, A. Orni & R. J. Trefler (2012): Explaining counterexamples using causality. Formal Methods in System Design 40(1), pp. 20–40, doi:10.1007/s10703-011-0132-2.
  3. I. Beer, S. Ben-David, C. Eisner & Y. Rodeh (2001): Efficient detection of vacuity in ACTL formulas. Formal Methods in System Design 18(2), pp. 141–162, doi:10.1023/A:1008779610539.
  4. H. Chockler, O. Grumberg & A. Yadgar (2008): Efficient automatic STE refinement using responsibility. In: Proc. 14th Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, pp. 233–248, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_17.
  5. H. Chockler & J.Y. Halpern (2004): Responsibility and blame: a structural-model approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 22, pp. 93–115.
  6. H. Chockler & O. Kupferman (2002): Coverage of Implementations by Simulating Specifications. In: R.A. Baeza-Yates, U. Montanari & N. Santoro: Proceedings of 2nd IFIP International Conference on Theoretical Computer Science, IFIP Conference Proceedings 223. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Montreal, Canada, pp. 409–421.
  7. H. Chockler, O. Kupferman, R.P. Kurshan & M.Y. Vardi (2001): A Practical Approach to Coverage in Model Checking. In: Computer Aided Verification, Proc. 13th International Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2102. Springer-Verlag, pp. 66–78, doi:10.1007/3-540-44585-4_7.
  8. H. Chockler, O. Kupferman & M.Y. Vardi (2001): Coverage Metrics for Temporal Logic Model Checking. In: Tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2031. Springer-Verlag, pp. 528 – 542, doi:10.1007/3-540-45319-9_36.
  9. H. Chockler, O. Kupferman & M.Y. Vardi (2003): Coverage Metrics for Formal Verification. In: Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods (CHARME), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2860. Springer-Verlag, pp. 111–125, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39724-3_11.
  10. Hana Chockler, Norman E. Fenton, Jeroen Keppens & David A. Lagnado (2015): Causal analysis for attributing responsibility in legal cases. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL. ACM, pp. 33–42, doi:10.1145/2746090.2746102.
  11. Hana Chockler, Joseph Y. Halpern & Orna Kupferman (2008): What causes a system to satisfy a specification?. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 9(3), doi:10.1145/1352582.1352588.
  12. E. M. Clarke, O. Grumberg & D. A. Peled (1999): Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..
  13. E.M. Clarke, O. Grumberg, K.L. McMillan & X. Zhao (1995): Efficient generation of counterexamples and witnesses in symbolic model checking. In: Proc. 32nd Design Automation Conference. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 427–432, doi:10.1145/217474.217565.
  14. N. Hall (2004): Two concepts of causation. In: J. Collins, N. Hall & L. A. Paul: Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..
  15. J. Y. Halpern & J. Pearl (2005): Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 56(4), pp. 843–887, doi:10.1093/bjps/axi148.
  16. Joseph Y. Halpern (2015): A Modification of the Halpern-Pearl Definition of Causality. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI. AAAI Press, pp. 3022–3033.
  17. J.Y. Halpern & J. Pearl (2001): Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach — Part 1: Causes. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 17th Conference (UAI-2001). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 194–202.
  18. Y. Hoskote, T. Kam, P.-H Ho & X. Zhao (1999): Coverage estimation for symbolic model checking. In: Proc. 36th Design automation conference, pp. 300–305.
  19. D. Hume (1939): A treatise of human nature. John Noon, London.
  20. O. Kupferman (2006): Sanity Checks in Formal Verification. In: Proc. 17th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4137. Springer-Verlag, pp. 37–51, doi:10.1007/11817949_3.
  21. O. Kupferman & M.Y. Vardi (2003): Vacuity detection in temporal model checking. Journal on Software Tools For Technology Transfer 4(2), pp. 224–233, doi:10.1007/s100090100062.
  22. D.A. Lagnado, T. Gerstenberg & R. Zultan (2013): Causal responsibility and counterfactuals. Cognitive Science 37, pp. 1036–1073, doi:10.1111/cogs.12054.
  23. R.A. De Millo, R.J. Lipton & F.G. Sayward (1978): Hints on test data selection: Help for the practicing programmer. IEEE Computer 11(4), pp. 34–41, doi:10.1109/C-M.1978.218136.
  24. R.A. De Millo & A.J. Offutt (1991): Constraint-based automatic test data generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 17(9), pp. 900–910, doi:10.1109/32.92910.
  25. RuleBase PE Homepage. http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/projects/verification/RB_Homepage.
  26. T. Schubert: High level formal verification of next-generation microprocessors. In: DAC'03.
  27. C.-J. H. Seger & R. E. Bryant (1995): Formal Verification by Symbolic Evaluation of Partially-Ordered Trajectories. Formal Methods in System Design 6(2), doi:10.1007/BF01383966.
  28. C.-J. H. Seger, R. B. Jones, J. W. O'Leary, T. F. Melham, M. Aagaard, C. Barrett & D. Syme (2005): An Industrially Effective Environment for Formal Hardware Verification. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 24(9), doi:10.1109/TCAD.2005.850814.
  29. S. Tasiran & K. Keutzer (2001): Coverage Metrics for Functional Validation of Hardware Designs. IEEE Design and Test of Computers 18(4), pp. 36–45, doi:10.1109/54.936247.
  30. J. Yang & A. Goel (2002): GSTE through a case study. In: ICCAD, doi:10.1145/774572.774651.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org