References

  1. Laura Bocchi, Cosimo Laneve & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2003): A Calculus for Long-Running Transactions. In: Proc. of FMOODS 2003, LNCS 2884. Springer, pp. 124–138, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39958-2_9.
  2. Mario Bravetti, Cinzia Di Giusto, Jorge A. Pérez & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2012): Adaptable processes. Logical Methods in Computer Science 8(4), doi:10.2168/LMCS-8(4:13)2012.
  3. Mario Bravetti, Cinzia Di Giusto, Jorge A. Pérez & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2012): Towards the Verification of Adaptable Processes. In: ISoLA, LNCS 7609. Springer, pp. 269–283, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34026-0_20.
  4. Mario Bravetti & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2009): On the expressive power of process interruption and compensation. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 19(3), pp. 565–599, doi:10.1017/S0960129509007683.
  5. Luís Caires, Carla Ferreira & Hugo Torres Vieira (2009): A Process Calculus Analysis of Compensations. In: Proc. of TGC 2008, LNCS 5474. Springer, pp. 87–103, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00945-7_6.
  6. Marco Carbone, Kohei Honda & Nobuko Yoshida (2008): Structured Interactional Exceptions in Session Types. In: CONCUR 2008, LNCS 5201. Springer, pp. 402–417, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85361-9_32.
  7. Jovana Dedei\'c, Jovanka Pantovi\'c & Jorge A. Pérez (2015): Full version of this paper. Technical Report. Available at http://www.jorgeaperez.net.
  8. Carla Ferreira, Ivan Lanese, António Ravara, Hugo Torres Vieira & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2011): Advanced Mechanisms for Service Combination and Transactions. In: Results of SENSORIA, LNCS 6582. Springer, pp. 302–325, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20401-2_14.
  9. Cinzia Di Giusto & Jorge A. Pérez (2015): Disciplined structured communications with disciplined runtime adaptation. Sci. Comput. Program. 97, pp. 235–265, doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.04.017.
  10. Cinzia Di Giusto & Jorge A. Pérez (2015): An Event-Based Approach to Runtime Adaptation in Communication-Centric Systems. In: Proc. of WS-FM 2014, LNCS. Springer. To appear.
  11. Daniele Gorla (2010): Towards a unified approach to encodability and separation results for process calculi. Inf. Comput. 208(9), pp. 1031–1053, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2010.05.002.
  12. Ivan Lanese, Cátia Vaz & Carla Ferreira (2010): On the Expressive Power of Primitives for Compensation Handling. In: Proc. of ESOP 2010, LNCS 6012. Springer, pp. 366–386, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11957-6_20.
  13. Ivan Lanese & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2013): Decidability Results for Dynamic Installation of Compensation Handlers. In: COORDINATION, LNCS 7890. Springer, pp. 136–150, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38493-6_10.
  14. Cosimo Laneve & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2005): Foundations of Web Transactions. In: Proc. of FOSSACS 2005, LNCS 3441. Springer, pp. 282–298, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31982-5_18.
  15. Robin Milner (1989): Communication and concurrency. PHI Series in computer science. Prentice Hall.
  16. Robin Milner, Joachim Parrow & David Walker (1992): A Calculus of Mobile Processes, I. Inf. Comput. 100(1), pp. 1–40, doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90008-4.
  17. Davide Sangiorgi (1992): Expressing Mobility in Process Algebras: First-Order and Higher Order Paradigms. University of Edinburgh.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org