References

  1. D. Austry & G. Boudol (1984): Algèbre de processus et synchronisations. Theoretical Computer Science 30(1), pp. 91–131, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(84)90067-7.
  2. P. Baldan, A. Bracciali & R. Bruni (2007): A semantic framework for open processes. Theoretical Computer Science 389(3), pp. 446–483, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2007.09.004.
  3. J.A. Bergstra & J.W. Klop (1984): The algebra of recursively defined processes and the algebra of regular processes. In: J. Paredaens: Proceedings 11th ICALP, Antwerpen, LNCS 172. Springer, pp. 82–94, doi:10.1007/3-540-13345-3_7.
  4. E. Bres, R.J. van Glabbeek & P. Höfner (2016): A Timed Process Algebra for Wireless Networks with an Application in Routing. Technical Report 9145. NICTA. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03663. Extended abstract in P. Thiemann, editor: Programming Languages and Systems: Proceedings 25th European Symposium on Programming, ESOP'16; held as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS'16, LNCS 9632, Springer, 2016, pp. 95-122.
  5. S.D. Brookes, C.A.R. Hoare & A.W. Roscoe (1984): A theory of communicating sequential processes. Journal of the ACM 31(3), pp. 560–599, doi:10.1145/828.833.
  6. W.J. Fokkink (2000): Introduction to Process Algebra. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science, An EATCS Series. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04293-9.
  7. W.J. Fokkink, R.J. van Glabbeek & B. Luttik (2017): Divide and Congruence III: Stability & Divergence. In: R. Meyer & U. Nestmann: Proceedings 28th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR'17, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) 85. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, pp. 15:1–15:16, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2017.15. Available at http://theory.stanford.edu/~rvg/abstracts.html#124.
  8. F. Gadducci & U. Montanari (2000): The tile model. In: G.D. Plotkin, C. Stirling & M. Tofte: Proof, Language, and Interaction, Essays in Honour of Robin Milner. The MIT Press, pp. 133–166.
  9. R.J. van Glabbeek (1993): Full abstraction in structural operational semantics (extended abstract). In: M. Nivat, C. Rattray, T. Rus & G. Scollo: Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology, AMAST'93, Twente, The Netherlands, June l993, Workshops in Computing. Springer, pp. 77–84. Available at http://theory.stanford.edu/~rvg/abstracts.html#28.
  10. R.J. van Glabbeek (1994): On the expressiveness of ACP (extended abstract). In: A. Ponse, C. Verhoef & S.F.M. van Vlijmen: Proceedings First Workshop on the Algebra of Communicating Processes, ACP94, Workshops in Computing. Springer, pp. 188–217, doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2120-6_8. Available at http://theory.stanford.edu/~rvg/abstracts.html#31.
  11. R.J. van Glabbeek (2004): The Meaning of Negative Premises in Transition System Specifications II. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 60–61, pp. 229–258, doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2004.03.007. Available at http://theory.stanford.edu/~rvg/abstracts.html#53.
  12. R.J. van Glabbeek (2011): Bisimulation. In: D. Padua: Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing. Springer, pp. 136–139, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09766-4_149. Available at http://theory.stanford.edu/~rvg/abstracts.html#45.
  13. R.J. van Glabbeek (2017): Lean and Full Congruence Formats for Recursion. In: Proceedings 32nd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS'17, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2017. IEEE Computer Society Press, doi:10.1109/LICS.2017.8005142. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03160.
  14. R.J. van Glabbeek (2018): A Theory of Encodings and Expressiveness. In: C. Baier & U. Dal Lago: Proceeding 21st International Conference on Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, FoSSaCS'18; held as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS'18, LNCS 10803. Springer, pp. 183–202, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89366-2_10.
  15. J.F. Groote (1993): Transition System Specifications with Negative Premises. Theoretical Computer Science 118, pp. 263–299, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(93)90111-6.
  16. J.F. Groote & F.W. Vaandrager (1992): Structured Operational Semantics and Bisimulation as a Congruence. Information and Computation 100(2), pp. 202–260, doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90013-6.
  17. K.G. Larsen & X. Liu (1991): Compositionality through an Operational Semantics of Contexts. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(6), pp. 761–795, doi:10.1093/logcom/1.6.761.
  18. N.A. Lynch & F.W. Vaandrager (1996): Action Transducers and Timed Automata. Formal Aspects of Computing 8(5), pp. 499–538, doi:10.1007/BF01211907.
  19. Y.I. Manin (1977): A Course in Mathematical Logic. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 53. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4385-2.
  20. R. Milner (1983): Calculi for synchrony and asynchrony. Theoretical Computer Science 25(3), pp. 267–310, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(83)90114-7.
  21. R. Milner (1990): Operational and algebraic semantics of concurrent processes. In: J. van Leeuwen: Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, chapter 19. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), pp. 1201–1242. Alternatively see Communication and Concurrency, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989, of which an earlier version appeared as A Calculus of Communicating Systems, LNCS 92, Springer, 1980.
  22. G.D. Plotkin (2004): A Structural Approach to Operational Semantics. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 60–61, pp. 17–139, doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2004.05.001. Originally appeared in 1981.
  23. A. Rensink (2000): Bisimilarity of Open Terms. Information and Computation 156(1-2), pp. 345–385, doi:10.1006/inco.1999.2818.
  24. R. de Simone (1985): Higher-level synchronising devices in Meije-SCCS. Theoretical Computer Science 37, pp. 245–267, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(85)90093-3.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org