References

  1. M. Boreale & R. De Nicola (1996): A symbolic semantics for the Pi-calculus. Inform. and Comput. 126(1), pp. 34–52.
  2. M. Bravetti & G. Zavattaro (2007): Towards a Unifying Theory for Choreography Conformance and Contract Compliance. In: Software Composition, Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci. 4829. Springer Verlag, pp. 34–50.
  3. M.G. Buscemi & H. Melgratti (2009): Abstract Processes in Orchestration Languages. In: ESOP, Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci. 5502. Springer Verlag, pp. 301–315.
  4. Giuseppe Castagna, Nils Gesbert & Luca Padovani (2008): A theory of contracts for web services. In: POPL, pp. 261–272.
  5. Giuseppe Castagna, Nils Gesbert & Luca Padovani (2009): A theory of contracts for Web services. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 31(5). Available at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1538917.1538920.
  6. R. De Nicola & M. Hennessy (1984): Testing Equivalences for Processes. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 34, pp. 83–133.
  7. Mariangiola Dezani-Ciancaglini, Dimitris Mostrous, Nobuko Yoshida & Sophia Drossopoulou (2006): Session Types for Object-Oriented Languages. In: Proc. ECOOP, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4067. Springer, pp. 328–352.
  8. Simon J. Gay & Malcolm Hole (2005): Subtyping for session types in the pi calculus. Acta Informaticae 42(2–3), pp. 191–225.
  9. M. Hennessy & H. Lin (1995): Symbolic bisimulations. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 138, pp. 353–389.
  10. Kohei Honda (1993): Types for Dynamic Interaction. In: Proc. CONCUR, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 715. Springer, pp. 509–523.
  11. Cosimo Laneve & Luca Padovani (2007): The Must Preorder Revisited. In: CONCUR, Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci. 4703, pp. 212–225.
  12. R. Milner (1989): Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall International.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org