References

  1. F.S. de Boer & C. Palamidessi (1994): Embedding as a Tool for Language Comparison. Information and Computation 108(1), pp. 128–157, doi:10.1006/inco.1994.1004.
  2. Marcello M. Bonsangue, Joost N. Kok & Gianluigi Zavattaro (1999): Comparing coordination models based on shared distributed replicated data. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 156–165, doi:10.1145/298151.298226.
  3. M. Bravetti, R. Gorrieri, R. Lucchi & G.Zavattaro (2005): Quantitative Information in the Tuple Space Coordination Model. Theoretical Computer Science 346(1), pp. 28–57, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.08.004.
  4. M. Bravetti, R. Gorrieri, R. Lucchi & G. Zavattaro (2004): Probabilistic and Prioritized Data Retrieval in the Linda Coordination Model. In: R. De Nicola, G.L. Ferrari & G. Meredith: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2949. Springer, pp. 55–70, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24634-3_7.
  5. A. Brogi & J.-M. Jacquet (1997): Modeling Coordination via Asynchronous Communication. In: D. Garlan & D. Le Métayer: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Coordination Languages and Models, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1282, Berlin, Germany, pp. 238–255, doi:10.1007/3-540-63383-9_84.
  6. A. Brogi & J.-M. Jacquet (1998): On the Expressiveness of Linda-like Concurrent Languages. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 16(2), pp. 61–82, doi:10.1016/S1571-0661(04)00118-5.
  7. A. Brogi & J.-M. Jacquet (1999): On the Expressiveness of Coordination Models. In: C. Ciancarini & A. Wolf: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Coordination Languages and Models, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1594. Springer-Verlag, pp. 134–149, doi:10.1007/3-540-48919-3_11.
  8. A. Brogi & J.-M. Jacquet (2003): On the Expressiveness of Coordination via Shared Dataspaces. Science of Computer Programming 46(1–2), pp. 71 – 98, doi:10.1016/S0167-6423(02)00087-4.
  9. A. Brogi, J.-M. Jacquet & I. Linden (2003): On Modeling Coordination via Asynchronous Communication and Enhanced Matching. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 68(3), doi:10.1016/S1571-0661(05)82568-X.
  10. Nadia Busi, Roberto Gorrieri & Gianluigi Zavattaro (1997): On the Turing equivalence of Linda coordination primitives. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 7, pp. 75–75, doi:10.1016/S1571-0661(05)80467-0.
  11. Nadia Busi, Roberto Gorrieri & Gianluigi Zavattaro (1998): A Process Algebraic View of Linda Coordination Primitives. Theoretical Computer Science 192, pp. 167–199, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00149-7.
  12. J.-M. Jacquet, I. Linden & D. Darquennes (2013): On Density in Coordination Languages. In: C. Canal & M. Villari: Proceedings of the European Conference on Service Oriented and Cloud Computing 2013, Communications in Computer and Information Science 393. Springer, pp. 189–203, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45364-9_16.
  13. I. Linden & J.-M. Jacquet (2004): On the Expressiveness of Absolute-Time Coordination Languages. In: R. De Nicola, G.L. Ferrari & G. Meredith: Proc. 6th International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2949. Springer, pp. 232–247, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24634-3_18.
  14. I. Linden & J.-M. Jacquet (2007): On the Expressiveness of Timed Coordination via Shared Dataspaces. Electronical Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 180(2), pp. 71–89, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2006.10.047.
  15. I. Linden, J.-M. Jacquet, K. De Bosschere & A. Brogi (2004): On the Expressiveness of Relative-Timed Coordination Models. Electronical Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 97, pp. 125–153, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2004.04.034.
  16. I. Linden, J.-M. Jacquet, K. De Bosschere & A. Brogi (2006): On the Expressiveness of Timed Coordination Models. Science of Computer Programming 61(2), pp. 152–187, doi:10.1016/j.scico.2005.10.011.
  17. E.Y. Shapiro (1992): Embeddings Among Concurrent Programming Languages. In: W.R. Cleaveland: Proceedings of Concur 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, pp. 486–503, doi:10.1007/BFb0084811.
  18. M. Viroli & M. Casadei (2009): Biochemical Tuple Spaces for Self-organising Coordination. In: J. Field & V. T. Vasconcelos: Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5521. Springer, pp. 143–162, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02053-7_8.
  19. G. Zavattaro (1998): On the incomparability of Gamma and Linda. Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis.
  20. Gianluigi Zavattaro (1998): Towards a Hierarchy of Negative Test Operators for Generative Communication. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 16, pp. 154–170, doi:10.1016/S1571-0661(04)00125-2.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org