References

  1. A. Arnold, A. Vincent & I. Walukiewicz (2003): Games for synthesis of controllers with partial observation. TCS 303(1), pp. 7–34, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(02)00442-5.
  2. L. Brim, J. Chaloupka, L. Doyen, R. Gentilini & J.-F. Raskin (2011): Faster algorithms for mean-payoff games. Formal Methods in System Design 38(2), pp. 97–118, doi:10.1007/s10703-010-0105-x.
  3. E.A. Emerson & C.S. Jutla (1991): Tree automata, Mu-Calculus and determinacy. In: FOCS'91. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 368–377, doi:10.1109/SFCS.1991.185392.
  4. E.A. Emerson, C.S. Jutla & A.P. Sistla (1993): On Model-Checking for Fragments of μ-Calculus. In: CAV, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 697. Springer, pp. 385–396, doi:10.1007/3-540-56922-7_32.
  5. J. Fearnley (2010): Non-oblivious Strategy Improvement. In: LPAR-16, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6355. Springer, pp. 212–230, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17511-4_13.
  6. O. Friedmann (2011): Recursive algorithm for parity games requires exponential time. RAIRO – Theor. Inf. and Applic. 45(4), pp. 449–457, doi:10.1051/ita/2011124.
  7. O. Friedmann & M. Lange (2009): Solving Parity Games in Practice. In: ATVA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5799. Springer, pp. 182–196, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04761-9_15.
  8. M. Gazda & T.A.C. Willemse (2013): Zielonka's Recursive Algorithm: dull, weak and solitaire games and tighter bounds. In: GandALF, EPTCS 119, pp. 7–20, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.119.4.
  9. M. Gazda & T.A.C. Willemse (2014): Strategy Derivation for Small Progress Measures. http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2149.
  10. E. Grädel, W. Thomas & T. Wilke (2002): Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games: A Guide to Current Research. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2500. Springer.
  11. M. Jurdziński (2000): Small Progress Measures for Solving Parity Games. In: STACS'00, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1770. Springer, pp. 290–301, doi:10.1007/3-540-46541-3_24.
  12. M. Jurdziński, M. Paterson & U. Zwick (2006): A Deterministic Subexponential Algorithm for Solving Parity Games. In: SODA'06. ACM/SIAM, pp. 117–123, doi:10.1145/1109557.1109571.
  13. H. Klauck (2001): Algorithms for Parity Games. In: Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games: A Guide to Current Research, chapter 7, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2500. Springer, pp. 107–129, doi:10.1007/3-540-36387-4_7.
  14. R. McNaughton (1993): Infinite games played on finite graphs. APAL 65(2), pp. 149–184, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(93)90036-D.
  15. S. Schewe (2007): Solving Parity Games in Big Steps. In: FSTTCS'07, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4855. Springer, pp. 449–460, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77050-3_37.
  16. S. Schewe (2008): An Optimal Strategy Improvement Algorithm for Solving Parity and Payoff Games. In: CSL, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5213. Springer, pp. 369–384, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87531-4_27.
  17. S. Schewe, A. Trivedi & T. Varghese (2015): Symmetric Strategy Improvement. In: ICALP, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9135. Springer, pp. 388–400, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_31.
  18. P. Stevens & C. Stirling (1998): Practical Model Checking Using Games. In: TACAS'98, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1384. Springer, pp. 85–101, doi:10.1007/BFb0054166.
  19. J. Vöge & M. Jurdziński (2000): A Discrete Strategy Improvement Algorithm for Solving Parity Games. In: CAV, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1855. Springer, pp. 202–215, doi:10.1007/10722167_18.
  20. W. Zielonka (1998): Infinite games on finitely coloured graphs with applications to automata on infinite trees. TCS 200(1-2), pp. 135 – 183, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(98)00009-7.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org