References

  1. P. A. Abdulla, M. Faouzi Atig, G. Delzanno & A. Podelski (2013): Push-Down Automata with Gap-Order Constraints. In: FSEN 2013, pp. 199–216, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40213-5_13.
  2. P. A. Abdulla, K. Cerans, B. Jonsson & Y.-K. Tsay (1996): General Decidability Theorems for Infinite-State Systems. In: LICS'96, pp. 313–321, doi:10.1109/LICS.1996.561359.
  3. P. A. Abdulla, G. Delzanno & L. Van Begin (2011): A classification of the expressive power of well-structured transition systems. Inf. Comput. 209(3), pp. 248–279, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2010.11.003.
  4. P. A. Abdulla & B. Jonsson (2001): Ensuring completeness of symbolic verification methods for infinite-state systems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 256(1-2), pp. 145–167, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00105-5.
  5. P. A. Abdulla & A. Nylén (2000): Better is Better than Well: On Efficient Verification of Infinite-State Systems. In: LICS'00. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 132–140, doi:10.1109/LICS.2000.855762.
  6. M. Bartoletti, P. Degano, G. L. Ferrari & R. Zunino (2009): Local policies for resource usage analysis. ACM TOPLAS 31(6), doi:10.1145/1552309.1552313.
  7. M. Bozzano: A Logic-Based Approach to Model Checking of Parameterized and Infinite-State Systems, PhD Thesis, DISI, University of Genova, June 2002.
  8. X. Cai & M. Ogawa (2013): Well-Structured Pushdown Systems. In: CONCUR 2013, pp. 121–136, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40184-8_10.
  9. X. Cai & M. Ogawa (2014): Well-Structured Pushdown System: Case of Dense Timed Pushdown Automata. In: FLOPS 2014, pp. 336–352, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07151-0_21.
  10. R. Chadha & M. Viswanathan (2009): Deciding branching time properties for asynchronous programs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410(42), pp. 4169–4179, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.021.
  11. G. Delzanno (2007): Constraint-based automatic verification of abstract models of multithreaded programs. TPLP 7(1-2), pp. 67–91, doi:10.1017/S1471068406002821.
  12. G. Delzanno (2015): Data Tracking in Parameterized Verification. In: TGC 2015.
  13. G. Delzanno & F. Rosa-Velardo (2013): On the coverability and reachability languages of monotonic extensions of Petri Nets. Theor. Comput. Sci. 467, pp. 12–29, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.09.021.
  14. A. Finkel & Ph. Schnoebelen (2001): Well-structured transition systems everywhere!. Theor. Comput. Sci. 256(1-2), pp. 63–92, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00102-X.
  15. R. Lazic, T. C. Newcomb, J. Ouaknine, A. W. Roscoe & J. Worrell (2007): Nets with Tokens Which Carry Data. In: ICATPN 2007, pp. 301–320, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73094-1_19.
  16. R. Majumdar, R. Meyer & Z. Wang (2013): Provenance Verification. In: RP '13, pp. 21–22, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41036-9_3.
  17. F. Rosa-Velardo & D. de Frutos-Escrig (2009): Decidability Results for Restricted Models of Petri Nets with Name Creation and Replication. In: Petri Nets, pp. 63–82, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02424-5_6.
  18. N. Tzevelekos (2011): Fresh-register automata. In: POPL 2011, pp. 295–306, doi:10.1145/1926385.1926420.
  19. N. Tzevelekos & R. Grigore (2013): History-Register Automata. In: FOSSACS 2013, pp. 17–33, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37075-5_2.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org