References

  1. Pedro Cabalar, Jorge Fandinno & Brais Muñiz (2020): A System for Explainable Answer Set Programming. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 325, pp. 124136, doi:10.4204/eptcs.325.19.
  2. M. Gelfond & V. Lifschitz (1988): The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: R. Kowalski & K. Bowen: Logic Programming: Proc. of the Fifth International Conf. and Symp., pp. 1070–1080.
  3. Roland Kaminski, Torsten Schaub & Philipp Wanko (2017): A tutorial on hybrid answer set solving with clingo. In: Reasoning Web International Summer School. Springer, pp. 167–203.
  4. V. Marek & M. Truszczyński (1999): Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm. In: The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-year Perspective, pp. 375–398, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60085-2_17.
  5. I. Niemelä (1999): Logic programming with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25(3,4), pp. 241–273, doi:10.1023/A:1018930122475.
  6. E. Pontelli, T.C. Son & O. El-Khatib (2009): Justifications for logic programs under answer set semantics. TPLP 9(1), pp. 1–56. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1471068408003633.
  7. Claudia Schulz & Francesca Toni (2016): Justifying answer sets using argumentation. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 16(1), pp. 59–110, doi:10.1017/S1471068414000702.
  8. Patrik Simons, Ilkka Niemelä & Timo Soininen (2002): Extending and implementing the stable model semantics. Artificial Intelligence 138(1-2), pp. 181–234, doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00187-X.
  9. Ly Ly Trieu, Tran Cao Son, Enrico Pontelli & Marcello Balduccini (2021): Generating explanations for answer set programming applications. In: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications III. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, pp. 390 – 403. Available at https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2587517.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org