References

  1. T. Brázdil, A. Kučera & O. Stražovský (2004): Deciding Probabilistic Bisimilarity Over Infinite-State Probabilistic Systems. In: P. Gardner & N. Yoshida: CONCUR 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3170. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 193–208, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-28644-8_13.
  2. S. Cattani & R. Segala (2002): Decision Algorithms for Probabilistic Bisimulation. In: CONCUR 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2421. Springer, pp. 371–385, doi:10.1007/3-540-45694-5_25.
  3. J. Desharnais, V. Gupta, R. Jagadeesan & P. Panangaden (2010): Weak bisimulation is sound and complete for PCTL^\voidb@x *. Inf. Comput. 208(2), pp. 203–219, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2009.11.002.
  4. C. Eisentraut, H. Hermanns, J. Schuster, A. Turrini & L. Zhang (2013): The Quest for Minimal Quotients for Probabilistic Automata. In: TACAS 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7795. Springer, pp. 16–31, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36742-7_2.
  5. V. Forejt, P. Jancar, S. Kiefer & J. Worrell (2012): Bisimilarity of Probabilistic Pushdown Automata. In: FSTTCS 2012, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) 18. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Germany, pp. 448–460, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.448. Available at http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2012/3880.
  6. H. Hermanns & A. Turrini (2012): Deciding Probabilistic Automata Weak Bisimulation in Polynomial Time. In: FSTTCS 2012, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) 18. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, pp. 435–447, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.435. Available at http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2012/3879/.
  7. M. Krein & D. Milman (1940): On extreme points of regular convex sets. Studia Mathematica 9(1), pp. 133–138. Available at http://eudml.org/doc/219061.
  8. N. Lynch, R. Segala & F. Vaandrager (2003): Compositionality for probabilistic automata. In: CONCUR 2003. Springer, pp. 208–221, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45187-7_14.
  9. N. A. Lynch, R. Segala & F. W. Vaandrager (2007): Observing Branching Structure through Probabilistic Contexts. SIAM J. Comput. 37(4), pp. 977–1013, doi:10.1147/S0097539704446487.
  10. A. Parma & R. Segala (2007): Logical characterizations of bisimulations for discrete probabilistic systems. In: Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures. Springer, pp. 287–301, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71389-0_21.
  11. R. Segala (1995): Modeling and Verification of Randomized Distributed Real-Time Systems. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at http://profs.sci.univr.it/~segala/www/phd.html.
  12. R. Segala & N. A. Lynch (1995): Probabilistic Simulations for Probabilistic Processes. Nord. J. Comput. 2(2), pp. 250–273, doi:10.1007/BFb0015027.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org