References

  1. Andreas Abel & Christian Sattler (2019): Normalization by Evaluation for Call-by-Push-Value and Polarized Lambda Calculus. In: Ekaterina Komendantskaya: Proceedings of the 21st International Symp. on Principles and Practice of Programming Languages, PPDP 2019. ACM, pp. 3:1–3:12, doi:10.1145/3354166.3354168.
  2. Vito M. Abrusci (1990): Non-Commutative Intuitionistic Linear Logic. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 36(4), pp. 297–318, doi:10.1002/malq.19900360405.
  3. Thorsten Altenkirch, Peter Dybjer, Martin Hofmann & Philip J. Scott (2001): Normalization by Evaluation for Typed Lambda Calculus with Coproducts. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual IEEE Symp. on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2001. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 303–310, doi:10.1109/LICS.2001.932506.
  4. Thorsten Altenkirch, Martin Hofmann & Thomas Streicher (1995): Categorical Reconstruction of a Reduction Free Normalization Proof. In: David H. Pitt, David E. Rydeheard & Peter T. Johnstone: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Category Theory and Computer Science, CTCS 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 953. Springer, pp. 182–199, doi:10.1007/3-540-60164-3_27.
  5. Thorsten Altenkirch & Tarmo Uustalu (2004): Normalization by Evaluation for λ^\voidb@x 2. In: Yukiyoshi Kameyama & Peter J. Stuckey: Proceedings of the 7th International Symp. on Functional and Logic Programming, FLOPS 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2998. Springer, pp. 260–275, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24754-8_19.
  6. Maxime Amblard & Christian Retoré (2014): Partially Commutative Linear Logic and Lambek Caculus with Product: Natural Deduction, Normalisation, Subformula Property. FLAP 1(1), pp. 53–94. Available at http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00001.pdf.
  7. Vincent Balat, Roberto Di Cosmo & Marcelo P. Fiore (2004): Extensional Normalisation and Type-Directed Partial Evaluation for Typed Lambda Calculus with Sums. In: Neil D. Jones & Xavier Leroy: Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL 2004. ACM, pp. 64–76, doi:10.1145/964001.964007.
  8. Andrew G. Barber (1997): Linear Type Theories, Semantics and Action Calculi. University of Edinburgh, UK. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1842/392.
  9. Nick Benton, Gavin M. Bierman, Valeria de Paiva & Martin Hyland (1993): A Term Calculus for Intuitionistic Linear Logic. In: Marc Bezem & Jan Friso Groote: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, TLCA '93, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 664. Springer, pp. 75–90, doi:10.1007/BFb0037099.
  10. Ulrich Berger & Helmut Schwichtenberg (1991): An Inverse of the Evaluation Functional for Typed lambda-calculus. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 1991. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 203–211, doi:10.1109/LICS.1991.151645.
  11. Taus Brock-Nannestad & Carsten Schürmann (2010): Focused Natural Deduction. In: Christian G. Fermüller & Andrei Voronkov: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning, LPAR 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6397. Springer, pp. 157–171, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_12.
  12. Marcelo P. Fiore (2002): Semantic Analysis of Normalisation by Evaluation for Typed Lambda Calculus. In: Proceedings of the 4th International ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, PPDP 2002. ACM, pp. 26–37, doi:10.1145/571157.571161.
  13. Masahito Hasegawa (1999): Logical Predicates for Intuitionistic Linear Type Theories. In: Jean-Yves Girard: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, TLCA 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1581. Springer, pp. 198–212, doi:10.1007/3-540-48959-2_15.
  14. Mark Hepple (1990): Normal Form Theorem Proving for the Lambek Calculus. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 1990, pp. 173–178. Available at https://aclanthology.org/C90-2030/.
  15. Martin Hyland & Andrea Schalk (2003): Glueing and Orthogonality for Models of Linear Logic. Theorerical Computer Science 294(1/2), pp. 183–231, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(01)00241-9.
  16. Francois Lamarche & Christian Retoré (1996): Proof Nets for the Lambek Calculus – an Overview. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Roma Workshop on Proofs and Linguistic Categories 1998, pp. 241–262. Available at https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00098442.
  17. Joachim Lambek (1958): The Mathematics of Sentence Structure. The American Mathematical Monthly 65(3), pp. 154–170, doi:10.2307/2310058.
  18. Joachim Lambek (1968): Deductive Systems and Categories I: Syntactic Calculus and Residuated Categories. Mathematical Systems Theory 2(4), pp. 287–318, doi:10.1007/bf01703261.
  19. Joachim Lambek (1969): Deductive Systems and Categories II: Standard Constructions and Closed Categories. In: Category theory, Homology Theory and Their Applications I. Springer, pp. 76–122, doi:10.1007/bfb0079385.
  20. Jeff Polakov (2001): Ordered Linear Logic and Applications. Carnegie Mellon University, USA. Available at https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jpolakow/diss.ps.
  21. Jeff Polakow & Frank Pfenning (1999): Natural Deduction for Intuitionistic Non-communicative Linear Logic. In: Jean-Yves Girard: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, TLCA 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1581. Springer, pp. 295–309, doi:10.1007/3-540-48959-2_21.
  22. Dirk Roorda (1992): Proof Nets for Lambek Calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation 2(2), pp. 211–231, doi:10.1093/logcom/2.2.211.
  23. Tarmo Uustalu, Niccoló Veltri & Noam Zeilberger (2021): Deductive Systems and Coherence for Skew Prounital Closed Categories. In: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen & Alwen Tiu: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages: Theory and Practice, LFMTP 2020, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 332. Open Publishing Assoc., pp. 35–53, doi:10.4204/eptcs.332.3.
  24. Nachiappan Valliappan & Alejandro Russo (2019): Exponential Elimination for Bicartesian Closed Categorical Combinators. In: Ekaterina Komendantskaya: Proceedings of the 21st International Symp. on Principles and Practice of Programming Languages, PPDP 2019. ACM, pp. 20:1–20:13, doi:10.1145/3354166.3354185.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org