References

  1. The Puzzle of the 3 Hats - The New York Times. https://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/the-puzzle-of-the-3-hats/.
  2. Guido Bacciagaluppi (2009): Is logic empirical. Handbook of Quantum Logic and Quantum Structures, pp. 49–78, doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52869-8.50006-2.
  3. Alexandru Baltag & Bryan Renne (2016): Dynamic Epistemic Logic. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2016 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/dynamic-epistemic/.
  4. Alexandru Baltag & Sonja Smets (2011): Quantum logic as a dynamic logic. Synthese 179(2), pp. 285–306, doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9783-6.
  5. Angelo Bassi & GianCarlo Ghirardi (2003): Dynamical reduction models. Physics Reports 379(5-6), pp. 257–426, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00103-0.
  6. Veronika Baumann & Stefan Wolf (2017): On Formalisms and Interpretations. arXiv:1710.07212.
  7. Enrico Beltrametti, Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara, Roberto Giuntini, Roberto Leporini & Giuseppe Sergioli (2016): A Quantum Computational Semantics for Epistemic Logical Operators. Part I: Epistemic Structures. arXiv:1602.07514.
  8. Enrico Beltrametti, Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara, Roberto Giuntini, Roberto Leporini & Giuseppe Sergioli (2016): A Quantum Computational Semantics for Epistemic Logical Operators. Part II: Semantics. arXiv:1602.07517.
  9. Garrett Birkhoff & John Von Neumann (1936): The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of mathematics, pp. 823–843, doi:10.2307/1968621.
  10. David Bohm (1952): A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I. Physical Review 85(2), pp. 166–179, doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166.
  11. David Bohm (1990): A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. Philosophical psychology 3(2-3), pp. 271–286, doi:10.1080/09515089008573004.
  12. Niels Bohr (1934): Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature: Four Essays 1. CUP Archive.
  13. Niels Bohr (1958): On atoms and human knowledge. Daedalus 87(2), pp. 164–175.
  14. Jeffrey Bub (2017): Why Bohr was (Mostly) Right. arXiv:1711.01604.
  15. Rudolf Carnap (1988): Meaning and necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic. University of Chicago Press.
  16. Carlton M. Caves, Christopher A. Fuchs & Rüdiger Schack (2002): Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities. Physical Review A 65(2), doi:10.1103/physreva.65.022305.
  17. Hugh Everett (1957): "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 29(3), pp. 454–462, doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.454.
  18. Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y Halpern, Yoram Moses & Moshe Vardi (2004): Reasoning about knowledge. MIT press, doi:10.7551/mitpress/5803.001.0001.
  19. Dan Falk (2016): New Support for Alternative Quantum View. https://www.quantamagazine.org/pilot-wave-theory-gains-experimental-support-20160516.
  20. Daniela Frauchiger & Renato Renner (2018): Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nature Communications 9(1), pp. 3711, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8.
  21. Tobias Fritz & Matthew Leifer (2015): Plausibility measures on test spaces. arXiv:1505.01151.
  22. Christopher A Fuchs (2017): On participatory realism. In: Information and Interaction. Springer, pp. 113–134, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43760-6_7.
  23. Christopher A. Fuchs, N. David Mermin & Rüdiger Schack (2014): An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics 82(8), pp. 749–754, doi:10.1119/1.4874855.
  24. James Garson (2016): Modal Logic. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2016 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/logic-modal/.
  25. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini & T. Weber (1986): Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D 34(2), pp. 470–491, doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.470.
  26. GC Ghirardi, A Rimini & T Weber (1985): A model for a unified quantum description of macroscopic and microscopic systems. In: Quantum Probability and Applications II. Springer, pp. 223–232, doi:10.1007/BFb0074474.
  27. Kurt Gödel (1931): Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38(1), pp. 173–198, doi:10.1007/BF01700692.
  28. Robert Goldblatt (2006): Mathematical modal logic: A view of its evolution. In: Handbook of the History of Logic 7. Elsevier, pp. 1–98, doi:10.1016/S1874-5857(06)80027-0.
  29. Lucien Hardy (1993): Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, pp. 1665–1668, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665.
  30. Werner Heisenberg (1958): The Representation of Nature in Contemporary Physics. Daedalus 87(3), pp. 95–108.
  31. Audun Jøsang (2001): A logic for uncertain probabilities. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 9(03), pp. 279–311, doi:10.1142/S0218488501000831.
  32. Saul Kripke (2007): Semantical considerations of the modal logic. Studia Philosophica 1.
  33. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & August Friedrich Bök (1771): Tentamina theodicaeae de bonitate Dei, libertate hominis et origine mali: 1 1. Berger.
  34. Clarence Irving Lewis (1918): A survey of symbolic logic. University of California Press.
  35. Clarence Irving Lewis, Cooper Harold Langford & P Lamprecht (1959): Symbolic logic. Dover Publications New York.
  36. Vilém Novák, Irina Perfilieva & Jiri Mockor (2012): Mathematical principles of fuzzy logic 517. Springer Science & Business Media, doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5217-8.
  37. Roger Penrose (1999): The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. Oxford Paperbacks.
  38. Graham Priest, Francesco Berto & Zach Weber (2018): Dialetheism. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2018 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  39. Graham Priest, Koji Tanaka & Zach Weber (2018): Paraconsistent Logic. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer 2018 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  40. Hilary Putnam (1969): Is logic empirical?. In: Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Springer, pp. 216–241, doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3381-7_5.
  41. Laura Schroeter (2017): Two-Dimensional Semantics. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer 2017 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  42. Anthony Sudbery (2017): Single-world theory of the extended Wigner's world experiment. Found. Phys. 47, pp. 658–669, doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0082-7. arXiv:1608.05873.
  43. Lev Vaidman (2001): Probability and the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory. arXiv:quant-ph/0111072.
  44. Lev Vaidman (2016): All is Ψ. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 701(1), pp. 012020. Available at http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/701/i=1/a=012020.
  45. Lev Vaidman (2016): Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2016 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/qm-manyworlds/.
  46. John Von Neumann (1955): Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics 2. Princeton University Press.
  47. Alexander Wilce (2017): Quantum Logic and Probability Theory. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2017 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-quantlog/.
  48. Ronald R Yager & Liping Liu (2008): Classic works of the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions 219. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4.
  49. Lotfi A Zadeh (1996): Fuzzy sets. In: Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, And Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers by Lotfi A Zadeh. World Scientific, pp. 394–432, doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
  50. H-J Zimmermann (1996): Fuzzy control. In: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Springer, pp. 203–240, doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0_11.
  51. Wojciech Hubert Zurek (2006): Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classicalrevisited. In: Quantum Decoherence. Springer, pp. 1–31, doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7808-0_1.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org