References

  1. P. Achinstein (1963): Variety and Analogy in Confirmation Theory. Philosophy of Science 30, pp. 207–221, doi:10.1086/287935.
  2. R. Carnap (1950): Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-3142-8.
  3. R. Carnap (1952): The Continuum of Inductive Methods. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  4. R. Carnap (1971): A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part 1. In: Rudolf Carnap & Richard C. Jeffrey: Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability I. University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp. 33–165.
  5. R. Carnap (1980): A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part 2. In: Richard C. Jeffrey: Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability II. University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp. 7–155.
  6. R. Carnap & W. Stegmüller (1959): Induktive Logik und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Springer, Wien, doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-3142-8.
  7. D. Costantini (1979): The Relevance Quotient. Erkenntnis 14, pp. 149–157, doi:10.1007/BF00166497.
  8. D. Costantini (1983): Analogy by Similarity. Erkenntnis 20, pp. 103–114, doi:10.1007/BF00166497.
  9. P. Diaconis & D. Freedman (1980): De Finetti's Generalizations of Exchangeability. In: Richard C. Jeffrey: Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability II. University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp. 233–249.
  10. P. Diaconis & D. Freedman (1980): De Finetti's Theorem for Markov Chains. Annals of Probability 8, pp. 115–130, doi:10.1214/aop/1176994828.
  11. R. Festa (1997): Analogy and Exchangeability in Predictive Inferences. Erkenntnis 45, pp. 89–112, doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5712-4-6.
  12. B. de Finetti (1937): La prevision: ses lois logiques ses sources subjectives. Annales d l'institut Henri Poincaré 7, pp. 1–68. Translated in Kyburg, H. E. and Smokler, H. E., editors,ıt Studies in Subjective Probability, pages 93–158, Wiley, New York, 1964.
  13. B. de Finetti (1938): Sur la condition d'equivalence partielle. In: Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles No. 739: Colloques consacré à la théorie des probabilités, VIième partie, Paris, pp. 5–18. Translated in Jeffrey, R. C., editor,ıt Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability II, pages 193–205, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1980.
  14. B. de Finetti (1959): La probabilita e la statistica nei raporti con l'induzione, secondo i dwersi punti di vista. In: Corso C.I.M.E su Induzione e Statistica. Cremones, Rome. Translated in de Finetti, B,ıt Probability, Induction and Statistics, chapter 9, Wiley, New York, 1974.
  15. S. Fortini, Lucia Ladelli, Giovanni Petris & E. Regazzini (2002): On Mixtures of Distributions of Markov Chains. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 100, pp. 147–165, doi:10.1016/S0304-4149(02)00093-5.
  16. D. Freedman (1962): Mixtures of Markov Processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33, pp. 114–118, doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704716.
  17. M. Hesse (1964): Analogy and Confirmation Theory. Philosophy of Science 31, pp. 319–324, doi:10.1086/288017.
  18. A. Hill & J. Paris (2013): An Analogy Principle in Inductive Logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 64, pp. 1293–1321, doi:10.1016/j.apal.2013.06.013.
  19. S. M. Huttegger (2015): Analogical Predictive Probabilities. Manuscript, University of California at Irvine.
  20. W. E. Johnson (1924): Logic, Part III: The Logical Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, doi:10.1093/mind/XLI.164.409.
  21. W. E. Johnson (1932): Probability: The Deductive and Inductive Problems. Mind 41, pp. 409–423.
  22. T. A. F. Kuipers (1978): Studies in Inductive Probability and Rational Expectation. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9830-8.
  23. T. A. F. Kuipers (1984): Two Types of Inductive Analogy by Similarity. Erkenntnis 21, pp. 63–87, doi:10.1007/BF00176183.
  24. T. A. F. Kuipers (1988): Inductive Analogy by Similarity and Proximity. In: D. H. Helman: Analogical Reasoning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7811-0-14.
  25. P. Maher (2000): Probabilities for Two Properties. Erkenntnis 52, pp. 63–91, doi:10.1023/A:1005557828204.
  26. P. Maher (2001): Probabilities for Multiple Properties: The Models of Hesse And Carnap And Kemeny. Erkenntnis 55, pp. 183–216, doi:10.1023/A:1012952802676.
  27. M. C. di Maio (1995): Predictive Probability and Analogy by Similarity in Inductive Logic. Erkenntnis 43, pp. 369–394, doi:10.1007/BF01135379.
  28. I. Niiniluoto (1981): Analogy and Inductive Logic. Erkenntnis 16, pp. 1–34, doi:10.1007/BF00219640.
  29. J.-W. Romeijn (2006): Analogical Predictions for Explicit Similarity. Erkenntnis 2006, pp. 253–280, doi:10.1007/s10670-005-0232-8.
  30. B. Skyrms (1991): Inductive Logic for Markov Chains. Erkenntnis 35, pp. 439–460, doi:10.1007/BF00388296.
  31. B. Skyrms (1993): Analogy by Similarity in Hyper-Carnapian Inductive Logic. In: J. Earman, A. I. Janis, G. Massey & N. Rescher: Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 273–283.
  32. W. Spohn (1981): Analogy and Inductive Logic: A Note on Niiniluoto. Erkenntnis 16, pp. 35–52, doi:10.1007/BF00219641.
  33. S. L. Zabell (1982): W. E. Johnson's ``Sufficientness" Postulate. The Annals of Statistics 10, pp. 1091–1099, doi:10.1214/aos/1176345975.
  34. S. L. Zabell (1989): The Rule of Succession. Erkenntnis 31, pp. 283–321, doi:10.1007/BF01236567.
  35. S. L. Zabell (1995): Characterizing Markov Exchangeable Sequences. Journal of Theoretical Probability 8, pp. 175–178, doi:10.1007/BF02213460.
  36. S. L. Zabell (2011): Carnap and the Logic of Inductive Inference. In: Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 265–309.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org