References

  1. I. Arieli & R.J. Aumann (2012): The logic of backward induction. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2133302 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2133302.
  2. D. Balkenborg & R. Nagel (2008): An experiment on forward versus backward Induction: How fairness and levels of reasoning matter. Working paper.
  3. P. Battigalli (1996): Strategic rationality orderings and the best rationalizability principle. Games and Economic Behavior 13, pp. 178–200, doi:10.1006/game.1996.0033.
  4. P. Battigalli (1997): On rationalizability in extensive games. Journal of Economic Theory 74, pp. 40–61, doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.2252.
  5. G.P. Cachon & C. Camerer (1996): Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(1), pp. 165–94, doi:10.2307/2946661.
  6. C. Camerer (2003): Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton University Press.
  7. J. Chen & S. Micali (2011): The robustness of extensive-form rationalizability. Working paper.
  8. J. Chen & S. Micali (2013): The order independence of iterated dominance in extensive games. Theoretical Economics 8, pp. 125–163, doi:10.3982/TE942.
  9. D. Fudenberg & E. Maskin (1986): The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 54, pp. 533–554, doi:10.2307/1911307.
  10. S. Ghosh, B. Meijering & R. Verbrugge (2014): Strategic reasoning: Building cognitive models from logical formulas. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(1), pp. 1–29, doi:10.1007/s10849-014-9196-x.
  11. T. Halder, K. Sharma, S. Ghosh & R. Verbrugge (2015): How do adults reason about their opponent? Typologies of players in a turn-taking game. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 854–859.
  12. T. Hedden & J. Zhang (2002): What do you think I think you think?: Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition 85(1), pp. 1–36, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00054-9.
  13. A. Heifetz (2012): Game Theory: Interactive Strategies in Economics and Management. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139049344.
  14. A. Heifetz & A. Perea (2015): On the outcome equivalence of backward induction and extensive form rationalizability. International Journal of Game Theory 44, pp. 37–59, doi:10.1007/s00182-014-0418-x.
  15. S. Huck & W. Müller (2005): Burning money and (pseudo) first-mover advantages: An experimental study on forward induction. Games and Economic Behavior 51(1), pp. 109–127, doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.03.006.
  16. R.D. McKelvey & T.R. Palfrey (1992): An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 803–836, doi:10.2307/2951567.
  17. B. Meijering, N. A. Taatgen, H. Van Rijn & R. Verbrugge (2014): Modeling inference of mental states: As simple as possible, as complex as necessary. Interaction Studies 15, pp. 455–477, doi:10.1075/is.15.3.05mei.
  18. B. Meijering, H. Van Rijn, N.A. Taatgen & R. Verbrugge (2011): I do know what you think I think: Second-order theory of mind in strategic games is not that difficult. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2486–2491.
  19. R. Nagel & F.F. Tang (1998): Experimental results on the centipede game in normal form: An investigation on learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42(2), pp. 356–384, doi:10.1006/jmps.1998.1225.
  20. D. Pearce (1984): Rationalizable strategic behaviour and the problem of perfection. Econometrica 52, pp. 1029–1050, doi:10.2307/1911197.
  21. A. Perea (2007): Epistemic foundations for backward induction: An overview. In: J. van Benthem, D. Gabbay & B. Löwe: Interactive Logic, Texts in Logic and Games 1. Amsterdam University Press, pp. 159–193.
  22. A. Perea (2012): Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511844072.
  23. A. Perea (2014): Belief in the opponents' future rationality. Games and Economic Behavior 83, pp. 231–254, doi:10.1016/j.geb.2013.11.008.
  24. P.J. Reny (1992): Backward induction, normal form perfection and explicable equilibria. Econometrica 60, pp. 627–649, doi:10.2307/2951586.
  25. R. Rosenthal (1981): Games of perfect information, predatory pricing, and the chain store. Journal of Economic Theory 25(1), pp. 92–100, doi:10.1016/0022-0531(81)90018-1.
  26. Q. Shahriar (2014): An experimental test of the robustness and the power of forward induction. Managerial and Decision Economics 35(4), pp. 264–277, doi:10.1002/mde.2613.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org