References

  1. Jonathan Bennett (1974): Counterfactuals and possible worlds. The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4(2), pp. 381–402, doi:10.1080/00455091.1974.10716947.
  2. Johan van Benthem, Patrick Girard & Olivier Roy (2009): Everything Else Being Equal: A Modal Logic for Ceteris Paribus Preferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38(1), pp. 83–125, doi:10.1007/s10992-008-9085-3.
  3. Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema (2001): Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050884.
  4. G. Lee Bowie (1979): The similarity approach to counterfactuals: Some problems. Noûs, pp. 477–498, doi:10.2307/2215340.
  5. Luis Fariñas del Cerro & Andreas Herzig (1994): Interference logic = conditional logic + frame axiom. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 9(1), pp. 119–130, doi:10.1002/int.4550090107.
  6. Luis Fariñas del Cerro & Andreas Herzig (1996): Belief change and dependence. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp. 147–161.
  7. Mukesh Dalal (1988): Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2, pp. 475–479.
  8. Hans van Ditmarsch, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Pieter Kooi (2007): Dynamic epistemic logic 337. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4.
  9. Jon Doyle & Michael P. Wellman (1994): Representing preferences as ceteris paribus comparatives. Ann Arbor 1001, pp. 48109–2110.
  10. Kit Fine (1975): Review of Lewis' counterfactuals. Mind 84, pp. 451–458, doi:10.1093/mind/LXXXIV.1.451.
  11. Davide Grossi, Emiliano Lorini & Francois Schwarzentruber (2013): Ceteris paribus structure in logics of game forms. Proceedings of the 14th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge. ACM..
  12. Vincent F. Hendricks (2006): Mainstream and formal epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Wesley H. Holliday (2014): Epistemic closure and epistemic logic I: Relevant alternatives and subjunctivism. Journal of Philosophical Logic, pp. 1–62, doi:10.1007/s10992-013-9306-2.
  14. Hirofumi Katsuno & Alberto O. Mendelzon (1991): Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence 52(3), pp. 263–294, doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90069-V.
  15. David Lewis (1973): Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press.
  16. David Lewis (1979): Counterfactual dependence and time's arrow. Noûs, pp. 455–476, doi:10.1093/0195036468.003.0002.
  17. Graham Priest (2008): An introduction to non-classical logic: From if to is. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801174.
  18. Carlo Proietti & Gabriel Sandu (2010): Fitch's paradox and ceteris paribus modalities. Synthese 173(1), pp. 75–87, doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9677-7.
  19. Dov Samet (1996): Hypothetical knowledge and games with perfect information. Games and economic behavior 17(2), pp. 230–251, doi:10.1006/game.1996.0104.
  20. Leonard J. Savage (1972): The foundations of statistics. Courier Corporation.
  21. Gerhard Schurz (2002): Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction. Erkenntnis (1975-) 57(3), pp. pp. 351–372, doi:10.1023/A:1021582327947.
  22. Jeremy Seligman & Patrick Girard (2011): Flexibility in Ceteris Paribus Reasoning. The Australasian Journal of Logic 10(0). Available at http://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ajl/article/view/1826.
  23. Bassel Tarbush (2013): Agreeing on decisions: an analysis with counterfactuals. Proceedings of the 14th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge. ACM..
  24. Georg H. von Wright (1963): The Logic of Preference. Edinburgh University Press.
  25. Zuojun Xiong & Jeremy Seligman (2011): Open and closed questions in decision-making. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 278, pp. 261–274, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2011.10.020.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org