References

  1. D. Ahn (2008): Ambiguity without a state space. Review of Economic Studies 71(1), pp. 3–28, doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00473.x.
  2. D. Ahn & H. Ergin (2010): Framing contingencies. Econometrica 78(2), pp. 655–695, doi:10.3982/ECTA7019.
  3. L. E. Blume, D. Easley & J. Y. Halpern (2006): Redoing the Foundations of Decision Theory. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proc. Tenth International Conference (KR '06), pp. 14–24. A longer version, entitled ``Constructive decision theory'', can be found at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/halpern/papers/behfinal.pdf..
  4. E. Dekel, B. Lipman & A. Rustichini (2001): Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space. Econometrica 69, pp. 891–934, doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00224.
  5. P. Ghirardato (2001): Coping with ignorance: unforeseen contingencies and non-additive uncertainty. Economic Theory 17, pp. 247–276, doi:10.1007/PL00004108.
  6. I. Gilboa & D. Schmeidler (2004): Subjective distributions. Theory and Decision 56, pp. 345–357, doi:10.1007/s11238-004-2596-7.
  7. E. Karni (2006): Subjective expected utility theory without states of the world. Journal of Mathematical Economics 42, pp. 325–342, doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2005.08.007.
  8. D. Kreps (1992): Static choice and unforeseen contingencies. In: P. Dasgupta, D. Gale & O. Hart: Economic Analysis of Markets and Games: Essays in Honor of Frank Hahn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  9. B. L. Lipman (1999): Decision theory without logical omniscience: Toward an axiomatic framework for bounded rationality. Review of Economic Studies 66, pp. 339–361, doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00090.
  10. M. Machina (2006): States of the World and State of Decision Theory. In: D. Meyer: The Economics of Risk. W. E. Upjohn Institute.
  11. J. Pearl (1995): Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82(4), pp. 669–710, doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669.
  12. L. J. Savage (1954): Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York.
  13. R. C. Stalnaker (1968): A theory of conditionals. In: N. Rescher: Studies in Logical Theory. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., pp. 98–112.
  14. A. Tversky & D. J. Koehler (1994): Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review 101(4), pp. 547–567, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.547.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org