Bas Luttik (Eindhoven University of Technology) |
Fei Yang (Eindhoven University of Technology) |

Reactive Turing machines extend classical Turing machines with a facility to model observable interactive behaviour. We call a behaviour executable if, and only if, it is behaviourally equivalent to the behaviour of a reactive Turing machine. In this paper, we study the relationship between executable behaviour and behaviour that can be specified in the pi-calculus. We establish that all executable behaviour can be specified in the pi-calculus up to divergence-preserving branching bisimilarity. The converse, however, is not true due to (intended) limitations of the model of reactive Turing machines. That is, the pi-calculus allows the specification of behaviour that is not executable up to divergence-preserving branching bisimilarity. Motivated by an intuitive understanding of executability, we then consider a restriction on the operational semantics of the pi-calculus that does associate with every pi-term executable behaviour, at least up to the version of branching bisimilarity that does not require the preservation of divergence. |

Published: 19th August 2015.

ArXived at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.189.5 | bibtex | |

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org |

For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org |