References

  1. Martín Abadi & Andrew D. Gordon (1997): A Calculus for Cryptographic Protocols: The Spi Calculus. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS '97. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 36–47, doi:10.1145/266420.266432.
  2. Jesper Bengtson, Magnus Johansson, Joachim Parrow & Björn Victor (2011): Psi-calculi: a framework for mobile processes with nominal data and logic. Logical Methods in Computer Science 7(1), doi:10.2168/LMCS-7(1:11)2011.
  3. Jesper Bengtson & Joachim Parrow (2009): Formalising the pi-calculus using nominal logic. Logical Methods in Computer Science 5(2), doi:10.2168/LMCS-5(2:16)2009.
  4. Johannes Borgström, Ramunas Gutkovas, Joachim Parrow, Björn Victor & Johannes Åman Pohjola (2013): A Sorted Semantic Framework for Applied Process Calculi (Extended Abstract). In: Trustworthy Global Computing, pp. 103–118, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05119-2_7.
  5. G. Boudol (1985): Notes on Algebraic Calculi of Processes. In: Krzysztof R. Apt: Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA, pp. 261–303, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82453-1_9.
  6. Nadia Busi, Roberto Gorrieri & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2000): On the Expressiveness of Linda Coordination Primitives.. Information and Computation 156(1-2), pp. 90–121, doi:10.1006/inco.1999.2823.
  7. Marco Carbone & Sergio Maffeis (2003): On the Expressive Power of Polyadic Synchronisation in π-calculus. Nordic Journal of Computing 10(2), pp. 70–98. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=941344.941346.
  8. Luca Cardelli & Andrew D. Gordon (1998): Mobile Ambients. In: Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures: First International Conference, FoSSaCS '98, pp. 140–155, doi:10.1007/BFb0053547.
  9. Giuseppe Castagna, Rocco De Nicola & Daniele Varacca (2008): Semantic Subtyping for the Pi-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science 398(1-3), pp. 217–242, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2008.01.049.
  10. Rocco De Nicola, Daniele Gorla & Rosario Pugliese (2006): On the Expressive Power of KLAIM-based Calculi. Theoretical Computer Science 356(3), pp. 387–421, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2006.02.007.
  11. David Gelernter (1985): Generative communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 7(1), pp. 80–112, doi:10.1145/2363.2433.
  12. Thomas Given-Wilson (2012): Concurrent Pattern Unification. PhD thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
  13. Thomas Given-Wilson (2014): An Intensional Concurrent Faithful Encoding of Turing Machines. In: 7th Interaction and Concurrency Experience (ICE 2014), Berlin, Germany. Available at http://hal.inria.fr/hal-00987594.
  14. Thomas Given-Wilson (2014): Expressiveness via Intensionality and Concurrency. In: To appear in: Proceedings of the 11th International Colloquium on Theoretical Aspects of Computing, ICTAC 2014. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.0956.
  15. Thomas Given-Wilson & Daniele Gorla (2013): Pattern Matching and Bisimulation. In: Rocco De Nicola & Christine Julien: Coordination Models and Languages, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7890. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 60–74, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38493-6_5.
  16. Thomas Given-Wilson, Daniele Gorla & Barry Jay (2010): Concurrent Pattern Calculus. In: Cristian S. Calude & Vladimiro Sassone: Theoretical Computer Science, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 323. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 244–258, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15240-5_18.
  17. Thomas Given-Wilson, Daniele Gorla & Barry Jay (2014): A Concurrent Pattern Calculus. To appear in: Logical Methods in Computer Science. Available at http://hal.inria.fr/hal-00987578.
  18. Thomas Given-Wilson & Barry Jay (2011): Getting the Goods with Concurrent bondi. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Programming Language Approaches to Concurrency and Communication-cEntric Software (PLACES).
  19. Rob J. van Glabbeek (2012): Musings on Encodings and Expressiveness. In: Proceedings of EXPRESS/SOS, EPTCS 89, pp. 81–98, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.89.7.
  20. D. Gorla (2008): Comparing Communication Primitives via their Relative Expressive Power. Information and Computation 206(8), pp. 931–952, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2008.05.001.
  21. D. Gorla (2010): A Taxonomy of Process Calculi for Distribution and Mobility. Distributed Computing 23(4), pp. 273–299, doi:10.1007/s00446-010-0120-6.
  22. D. Gorla (2010): Towards a Unified Approach to Encodability and Separation Results for Process Calculi. Information and Computation 208(9), pp. 1031–1053, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2010.05.002.
  23. Christian Haack & Alan Jeffrey (2006): Pattern-matching Spi-calculus. Information and Computation 204(8), pp. 1195–1263, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2006.04.004.
  24. Bjørn Haagensen, Sergio Maffeis & Iain Phillips (2008): Matching Systems for Concurrent Calculi. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 194(2), pp. 85 – 99, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2007.11.004. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Expressiveness in Concurrency (EXPRESS 2007).
  25. Kohei Honda & Nobuko Yoshida (1995): On reduction-based process semantics. Theoretical Computer Science 152, pp. 437–486, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(95)00074-7.
  26. Barry Jay & Thomas Given-Wilson (2011): A combinatory account of internal structure. Journal of Symbolic Logic 76(3), pp. 807–826, doi:10.2178/jsl/1309952521.
  27. Ivan Lanese, Jorge A. Pérez, Davide Sangiorgi & Alan Schmitt (2010): On the Expressiveness of Polyadic and Synchronous Communication in Higher-Order Process Calculi. In: Proceedings of International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), LNCS 6199. Springer, pp. 442–453, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14162-1_37.
  28. Ivan Lanese, Cátia Vaz & Carla Ferreira (2010): On the Expressive Power of Primitives for Compensation Handling. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Programming Languages and Systems, ESOP'10. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 366–386, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11957-6_20.
  29. Robin Milner (1993): The Polyadic π-Calculus: A Tutorial. In: Logic and Algebra of Specification, Series F 94. NATO ASI. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58041-3_6.
  30. Robin Milner, Joachim Parrow & David Walker (1992): A Calculus of Mobile Processes, I. Information and Computation 100(1), pp. 1–40, doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90008-4.
  31. Robin Milner, Joachim Parrow & David Walker (1992): A Calculus of Mobile Processes, II. Information and Computation 100(1), pp. 41–77, doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90009-5.
  32. Rocco De Nicola, Gian Luigi Ferrari & Rosario Pugliese (1998): KLAIM: A Kernel Language for Agents Interaction and Mobility. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(5), pp. 315–330, doi:10.1109/32.685256.
  33. Lasse Nielsen, Nobuko Yoshida & Kohei Honda (2010): Multiparty Symmetric Sum Types. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Expressiveness in Concurrency (EXPRESS 2010), pp. 121–135, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.41.9.
  34. Catuscia Palamidessi (2003): Comparing the Expressive Power of the Synchronous and Asynchronous pi-calculi. Mathematical. Structures in Comp. Sci. 13(5), pp. 685–719, doi:10.1017/S0960129503004043.
  35. J. Parrow & B. Victor (1998): The fusion calculus: expressiveness and symmetry in mobile processes. In: Proceedings of Thirteenth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 176–185, doi:10.1109/LICS.1998.705654.
  36. Joachim Parrow (2008): Expressiveness of Process Algebras. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 209, pp. 173–186, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2008.04.011.
  37. Vijay A. Saraswat, Martin Rinard & Prakash Panangaden (1991): The Semantic Foundations of Concurrent Constraint Programming. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL '91. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 333–352, doi:10.1145/99583.99627.
  38. Robert de Simone (1985): Higher-Level Synchronising Devices in Meije-SCCS. Theoretical Computer Science 37, pp. 245–267, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(85)90093-3.
  39. Christian Urban, Stefan Berghofer & Michael Norrish (2007): Barendregt’s Variable Convention in Rule Inductions. In: Frank Pfenning: Automated Deduction – CADE-21, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4603. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 35–50, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73595-3_4.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org