References

  1. Z. Cao (2006): More on Bisimulations for Higher Order π-Calculus. In: L. Aceto & A. In\'golfsdóttir: Proceedings of FOSSACS2006, LNCS 3921, pp. 63–78, doi:10.1007/11690634_5. Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2006, Vienna, Austria, March 25-31, 2006..
  2. A. Jeffrey & J. Rathke (2005): Contextual equivalence for higher-order pi-calculus revisited. Logical Methods in Computer Science 1(1:4), doi:10.2168/LMCS-1(1:4)2005.
  3. I. Lanese, J. A. Pérez, D. Sangiorgi & A. Schmitt (2010): On the Expressiveness of Polyadic and Synchronous Communication in Higher-Order Process Calculi. In: Proceedings of ICALP 2010, LNCS. Springer Verlag, pp. 442–453, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14162-1_37.
  4. I. Lanese, J. A. Pérez, D. Sangiorgi & A. Schmitt (2011): On the Expressiveness and Decidability of Higher-Order Process Calculi. Information and Computation 209(2), pp. 198–226, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2010.10.001.
  5. I. Lanese, J.A. Perez, D. Sangiorgi & A. Schmitt (2008): On the Expressiveness and Decidability of Higher-Order Process Calculi. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2008). IEEE Computer Society, pp. 145–155, doi:10.1109/LICS.2008.8. Journal version in LPSS10a.
  6. R. Milner (1992): Functions as Processes. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 2(2), pp. 119–141, doi:10.1017/S0960129500001407. Research Report 1154, INRIA, Sofia Antipolis, 1990.
  7. D. Sangiorgi (1992): Expressing Mobility in Process Algebras: First-order and Higher-order Paradigms. Phd thesis. University of Edinburgh.
  8. D. Sangiorgi (1992): From π-Calculus to Higher-Order π-Calculus—and Back. In: Proceedings of TAPSOFT '93, LNCS 668. Springer Verlag, pp. 151–166, doi:10.1007/3-540-56610-4_62.
  9. D. Sangiorgi (1996): Bisimulation for Higher-order Process Calculi. Information and Computation 131(2), pp. 141–178, doi:10.1006/inco.1996.0096. Preliminary version in proceedings of PROCOMET'94 (IFIP Working Conference on Programming Concepts, Methods and Calculi), pages 207-224, North Holland, 1994.
  10. D. Sangiorgi (1996): Pi-calculus, Internal Mobility and Agent-Passing Calculi. Theoretical Computer Science 167(2), doi:10.1016/0304-3975(96)00075-8. Extracts of parts of the material contained in this paper can be found in the Proceedings of TAPSOFT'95 and ICALP'95.
  11. D. Sangiorgi (1998): On the Bisimulation Proof Method. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 8(6), pp. 447–479, doi:10.1017/S0960129598002527. An extended abstract in Proceedings of MFCS'95, LNCS 969, pp. 479-488, Springer Verlag.
  12. D. Sangiorgi, N. Kobayashi & E. Sumii (2011): Environmental bisimulations for higher-order languages. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 33(1), pp. 5, doi:10.1145/1889997.1890002.
  13. D. Sangiorgi & D. Walker (2001): The Pi-calculus: a Theory of Mobile Processes. Cambridge Universtity Press.
  14. B. Thomsen (1990): Calculi for Higher Order Communicating Systems. Phd thesis. Department of Computing, Imperial College.
  15. B. Thomsen (1993): Plain CHOCS, a Second Generation Calculus for Higher-Order Processes. Acta Informatica 30(1), pp. 1–59, doi:10.1007/BF01200262.
  16. J.-L. Vivas & M. Dam (1998): From Higher-Order Pi-Calculus to Pi-Calculus in the Presence of Static Operators. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, LNCS 1466, pp. 115–130, doi:10.1007/BFb0055619. Nice, France, September 8-11, 1998.
  17. Xian Xu (2012): Distinguishing and Relating Higher-order and First-order Processes by Expressiveness. Acta Informatica 49(7-8), pp. 445–484, doi:10.1007/s00236-012-0168-9.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org