References

  1. J. C. M. Baeten, J. A. Bergstra & J. W. Klop (1987): On the consistency of Koomen's Fair Abstraction Rule. Theoretical Computer Science 51(1–2), pp. 129 – 176, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(87)90052-1.
  2. Jos C. M. Baeten, Twan Basten & Michel A. Reniers (2010): Process algebra: equational theories of communicating processes 50. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139195003.
  3. Jos C. M. Baeten, Bas Luttik & Paul van Tilburg (2013): Reactive Turing Machines. Inform. Comput. 231, pp. 143–166, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2013.08.010.
  4. Twan Basten (1996): Branching Bisimilarity is an Equivalence Indeed!. Inf. Process. Lett. 58(3), pp. 141–147, doi:10.1016/0020-0190(96)00034-8.
  5. Mikolaj Bojanczyk, Bartek Klin, Slawomir Lasota & Szymon Torunczyk (2013): Turing Machines with Atoms. In: 28th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 25-28, 2013. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 183–192, doi:10.1109/LICS.2013.24.
  6. Nadia Busi, Maurizio Gabbrielli & Gianluigi Zavattaro (2009): On the expressive power of recursion, replication and iteration in process calculi. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 19(06), pp. 1191–1222, doi:10.1017/S096012950999017X.
  7. Eugene Eberbach (2007): The $-calculus process algebra for problem solving: A paradigmatic shift in handling hard computational problems. Theoretical Computer Science 383(2), pp. 200–243, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2007.04.012.
  8. Yuxi Fu (2014): Theory of Interaction. Available at http://basics.sjtu.edu.cn/~yuxi/.
  9. Yuxi Fu & Hao Lu (2010): On the expressiveness of interaction. Theoretical Computer Science 411(11–13), pp. 1387 – 1451, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2009.11.011.
  10. R. J. van Glabbeek & W. Peter Weijland (1996): Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 43(3), pp. 555–600, doi:10.1145/233551.233556.
  11. Rob J. van Glabbeek (1993): The linear time — branching time spectrum II. In: CONCUR'93. Springer, pp. 66–81, doi:10.1007/3-540-57208-2_6.
  12. Rob J. van Glabbeek, Bas Luttik & Nikola Trčka (2009): Branching bisimilarity with explicit divergence. Fundamenta Informaticae 93(4), pp. 371–392, doi:10.3233/FI-2009-109.
  13. Daniele Gorla (2010): Towards a unified approach to encodability and separation results for process calculi. Inf. Comput. 208(9), pp. 1031–1053, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2010.05.002.
  14. Robin Milner (1990): Functions as processes. In: Michael S. Paterson: Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 443. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 167–180, doi:10.1007/BFb0032030.
  15. Robin Milner, Joachim Parrow & David Walker (1992): A calculus of mobile processes, I & II. Information and computation 100(1), pp. 1–77, doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90008-4.
  16. C. A. Petri (1962): Kommunikation mit Automaten.. Bonn: Institut für Instrumentelle Mathematik, Schriften des IIM Nr. 2.
  17. I. C. C. Phillips (1993): A Note on Expressiveness of Process Algebra. In: G. L. Burn, S. Gay & M. D. Ryan: Proceedings of the First Imperial College Department of Computing Workshop on Theory and Formal Methods, Workshops in Computing. Springer-Verlag, pp. 260–264, doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-3503-6_20.
  18. Davide Sangiorgi & David Walker (2001): The Pi-Calculus - a theory of mobile processes. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Alan Mathison Turing (1936): On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. J. of Math 58, pp. 345–363.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org