References

  1. Joaquín Arias, Manuel Carro, Elmer Salazar, Kyle Marple & Gopal Gupta (2018): Constraint Answer Set Programming without Grounding. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 18(3-4), pp. 337–354, doi:10.1017/S1471068418000285.
  2. Marcello Balduccini & Michael Gelfond (2003): Diagnostic reasoning with A-Prolog. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 3(4-5), pp. 425–461, doi:10.1017/S1471068403001807.
  3. Georg Boenn, Martin Brain, Marina De Vos & John ffitch (2010): Automatic Music Composition using Answer Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 11, doi:10.1017/S1471068410000530.
  4. Gerhard Brewka, Thomas Eiter & Miroslaw Truszczynski (2011): Answer set programming at a glance. Commun. ACM 54(12), pp. 92–103, doi:10.1145/2043174.2043195.
  5. Daniel Brooks, Esra Erdem, Selim Erdoğan, James Minett & Don Ringe (2007): Inferring Phylogenetic Trees Using Answer Set Programming. Journal of Automated Reasoning 39, pp. 471–511, doi:10.1007/s10817-007-9082-1.
  6. Pedro Cabalar, Jorge Fandinno & Michael Fink (2014): Causal Graph Justifications of Logic Programs. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming TPLP 14(4-5), pp. 603–618, doi:10.1017/S1471068414000234.
  7. Esra Erdem, Erdi Aker & Volkan Patoglu (2012): Answer set programming for collaborative housekeeping robotics: Representation, reasoning, and execution. Intelligent Service Robotics 5, doi:10.1007/s11370-012-0119-x.
  8. Jorge Fandinno (2016): Deriving conclusions from non-monotonic cause-effect relations. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 16(5-6), pp. 670–687, doi:10.1017/S1471068416000466.
  9. Jorge Fandinno & Claudia Schulz (2019): Answering the ``why" in answer set programming - A survey of explanation approaches. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 19(2), doi:10.1017/S1471068418000534.
  10. M. Gebser, R. Kaminski, B. Kaufmann, M. Ostrowski, T. Schaub & P. Wanko (2016): Theory Solving Made Easy with Clingo 5. In: M. Carro & A. King: Technical Communications of the Thirty-second International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'16), OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs) 52. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, pp. 2:1–2:15, doi:10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2016.2.
  11. Vladimir Lifschitz, Patrick Lühne & Torsten Schaub (2019): Verifying Strong Equivalence of Programs in the Input Language of gringo, pp. 270–283, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20528-7_20.
  12. Victor W. Marek & Miroslaw Truszczyński (1999): Stable Models and an Alternative Logic Programming Paradigm. In: Krzysztof R. Apt, Victor W. Marek, Mirosław Truszczyński & DavidS Warren: The Logic Programming Paradigm, Artificial Intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 375–398, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60085-2_17.
  13. Ilkka Niemelä (1999): Logic Programs with Stable Model Semantics as a Constraint Programming Paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25(3-4), pp. 241–273, doi:10.1023/A:1018930122475.
  14. Enrico Pontelli, Tran Cao Son & Omar El-Khatib (2009): Justifications for logic programs under answer set semantics. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming TPLP 9(1), doi:10.1017/S1471068408003633.
  15. Claudia Schulz & Francesca Toni (2016): Justifying answer sets using argumentation 16, pp. 59–110, doi:10.1017/S1471068414000702.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org