References

  1. L. de Alfaro, T. A. Henzinger & R. Majumdar (2003): Discounting the Future in Systems Theory. In: ICALP 2003, LNCS 2719. Springer, pp. 1022–1037, doi:10.1007/3-540-45061-0_79.
  2. L. de Alfaro, R. Majumdar, V. Raman & M. Stoelinga (2007): Game Relations and Metrics. In: LICS 2007. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 99–108, doi:10.1109/LICS.2007.22.
  3. F. van Breugel (2005): A Behavioural Pseudometric for Metric Labelled Transition Systems. In: CONCUR 2005, LNCS 3653. Springer, pp. 141–155, doi:10.1007/11539452_14.
  4. F. van Breugel & J. Worrell (2005): A behavioural pseudometric for probabilistic transition systems. Theoretical Computer Science 331(1), pp. 115–142, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2004.09.035.
  5. P. Cerný, T. A. Henzinger & A. Radhakrishna (2010): Quantitative Simulation Games. In: EMAP 2010, pp. 42–60, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13754-9_3.
  6. P. Cerný, T. A. Henzinger & A. Radhakrishna (2010): Simulation Distances. In: CONCUR 2010, pp. 253–268, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15375-4_18.
  7. D. Della Monica, V. Goranko, A. Montanari & G. Sciavicco (2011): Interval Temporal Logics: a Journey. Bulletin of the EATCS 105.
  8. J. Desharnais, V. Gupta, R. Jagadeesan & P. Panangaden (2004): Metrics for labelled Markov processes. Theoretical Computer Science 318(3), pp. 323–354, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2003.09.013.
  9. J. Desharnais, F. Laviolette & M. Tracol (2008): Approximate Analysis of Probabilistic Processes: Logic, Simulation and Games. In: QEST 2008. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 264–273, doi:10.1109/QEST.2008.42.
  10. U. Fahrenberg, C. R. Thrane & K. G. Larsen (2011): Distances for Weighted Transition Systems: Games and Properties. In: QAPL 2011, pp. 134–147, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.57.10.
  11. N. Ferns, P. Panangaden & D. Precup (2011): Bisimulation Metrics for Continuous Markov Decision Processes. SIAM J. Comput. 40(6), pp. 1662–1714, doi:10.1137/10080484X.
  12. K. G. Larsen, U. Nyman & A. Wasowski (2007): Modal I/O Automata for Interface and Product Line Theories. In: ESOP 2007, LNCS 4421. Springer, pp. 64–79, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71316-6_6.
  13. G. Lüttgen & W. Vogler (2013): Modal Interface Automata. Logical Methods in Computer Science 9(3), doi:10.2168/LMCS-9(3:4)2013.
  14. R. Milner (1989): Communication and concurrency. Prentice Hall.
  15. D.M.R. Park (1981): Concurrency and automata on infinite sequences. In: Theoretical Computer Science, 5th Gl-Conference, LNCS 104. Springer, pp. 167–183, doi:10.1007/BFb0017309.
  16. J.-B. Raclet, E. Badouel, A. Benveniste, B.ît Caillaud, A. Legay & R. Passerone (2011): A Modal Interface Theory for Component-based Design. Fundam. Inform. 108(1-2), pp. 119–149, doi:10.3233/FI-2011-416.
  17. D. Romero-Hernández & D. de Frutos-Escrig (2012): Defining Distances for All Process Semantics. In: FMOODS/FORTE 2012, pp. 169–185, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30793-5_11.
  18. D. Romero-Hernández & D. de Frutos-Escrig (2012): Distances between Processes: A Pure Algebraic Approach. In: WADT 2012, pp. 265–282, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37635-1_16.
  19. D. Romero-Hernández & D. de Frutos-Escrig (2014): Coinductive Definition of Distances between Processes: Beyond Bisimulation Distances. In: FORTE 2014, pp. 249–265, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43613-4_16.
  20. Davide Sangiorgi (2009): On the origins of bisimulation and coinduction. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 31(4), doi:10.1145/1516507.1516510.
  21. C. Stirling (1998): The Joys of Bisimulation. In: MFCS 1998, LNCS 1450. Springer, pp. 142–151, doi:10.1007/BFb0055763.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org